ISSN: 0320-8095
ISSN: 0320-8095
En Ru
Phraseological units in Turkish media: translation problems in the context of evaluativeness

Phraseological units in Turkish media: translation problems in the context of evaluativeness

Article in Elibrary

Received: 02/25/2026

Accepted: 10/16/2026

Published: 10/30/2026

Keywords: Turkish language; Turkish media; translation of phraseological units; evaluativeness; semantics; expressiveness; political context

Available in the on-line version with: 30.10.2026

To cite this article

Larisa V. Sofronova Phraseological units in Turkish media: translation problems in the context of evaluativeness. // Lomonosov Oriental Studies Journal. 2026. Vol. 70. N 3,70 p.86-106 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0320-8095-13-70-3-6.

N 3, 2026

Abstract

The article examines phraseological units used in political texts of contemporary Turkish media. Following V.V. Vinogradov’s classification, phraseological fusions and unities are selected for analysis from the point of view of their initial and contextual evaluativeness in order to achieve adequate translation in the Turkish–Russian language pair. The study employs descriptive-comparative, componential and contextual analysis. The results show that the initial evaluativeness of a phraseological unit in a political context may be preserved or reversed; the same phraseological unit may have evaluatively opposite contextual variants. The semantics recorded in phraseological dictionaries or in the explanations of the Turkish Language Association may be transformed in accordance with the political context. Changes in the idiom’s composition do not significantly affect its evaluativeness or semantics, although they can increase expressiveness or emphasize particular semantic nuances. A number of Turkish phraseological units actively used in the media are not included in phraseological dictionaries, which likely indicates their relatively recent origin. Some phraseological units enter political discourse from other spheres, including scientific and sports discourse. When translating phraseological fusions and unities in media context, it is necessary to take into account their stylistic affiliation, expressiveness and emotional connotation. For this reason, selecting an equivalent in the target language is not always the best solution. For some idioms that are difficult for the target audience to perceive, calquing is impossible, and the translator must choose a syntactically different variant based on the semantics of the original idiom.

References

  1. Akhmedzhanova D.B. Problemy perevoda turetskikh frazeologicheskikh edinits na russkii yazyk: voprosy ekvivalentnosti i bezekvivalentnosti [Problems of Translating Turkish Phraseological Units into Russian: Issues of Equivalence and Non-equivalence]. The Journal of Humanities & Natural Sciences, 2025, no. 21(04), vol. 1, pp. 185–197. (In Russ.)
  2. Belykh E.N. Pragmaticheskoe i kontseptual’noe soderzhanie otsenki v politicheskom diskurse (na materiale turetskogo yazyka) [Pragmatic and conceptual content of assessment in political discourse (based on the Turkish language)]. PhD dissertation. Moscow, Military University, 2019. 148 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Vakurov V.N. Osnovy stilistiki frazeologicheskikh edinits (na materiale sovetskogo fel’etona) [Fundamentals of the Stylistics of Phraseological Units (Based on the Soviet Feuilleton)]. Moscow, Moscow University Press, 1983. 175 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Vinogradov V.V. Ob osnovnykh tipakh frazeologicheskikh edinits v russkom yazyke [On the Main Types of Phraseological Units in the Russian Language]. In: Izbrannye trudy. Leksikologiya i leksikografiya [Selected Works. Lexicology and Lexicography]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. Available at: https://lingvotech.com/vinogradov-77d (accessed: 02.02.2026). (In Russ.)
  5. Klushina N.I. Kommunikativnaya stilistika publitsisticheskogo teksta [Communicative Stylistics of a Journalistic Text]. Mir russkogo slova, 2008, no. 4, pp. 67–70. (In Russ.)
  6. Klushina N.I. Sovremennyi mediadiskurs i ego kommunikativno-stilisticheskie osobennosti [Modern Media Discourse and Its Communicative and Stylistic Features]. Mir russkogo slova, 2010, no. 2, pp. 25–29. (In Russ.)
  7. Kostomarov V.G. Russkii yazyk na gazetnoi polose [The Russian Language on the Newspaper Page]. Moscow, Moscow University Press, 1970. 267 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Fadeeva I.V. Mekhanizmy otsenochnoi frazeologicheskoi nominatsii [Mechanisms of Evaluative Phraseological Nomination]. In: Frazeologicheskaya nominatsiya v statike i dinamike [Phraseological Nomination in Statics and Dynamics]. Moscow, Institute of Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1988, pp. 151–161. (In Russ.)
  9. Aktay Sonnur. Rus basın dilinde kullanılan deyimler [Idioms Used in Russian Press Language]. In: Deyimbilim. Geleneksel ve Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar. Ankara, Nobel Bilimsel, 2024, pp. 327–340. (In Turkish)
  10. Kılıçdaroğlu ‘ezik’ fotoğrafa arka çıktı [Kılıçdaroğlu Defended the “Weak” Photo]. Yeni Akit, 17.10.2017. Available at: https://www.yeniakit.com.tr/haber/kilicdaroglu-ezik-fotografa-arka-cikti-386155.html (accessed: 31.01.2026). (In Turkish)
  11. Sakarya Gülçin. Konu Gazze olunca dünya üç maymunu oynuyor [When It Comes to Gaza, the World Plays Three Monkeys]. TRT Haber, 16.10.2024. Available at: https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/konu-gazze-olunca-dunya-uc-maymunu-oynuyor-882616.html (accessed: 31.01.2026). (In Turkish)
  12. Turan Rahmi. Turpun Büyüğü! [The Biggest Radish!]. Sözcü, 24.01.2024. Available at: https://www.sozcu.com.tr/turpun-buyugu-p14274 (accessed: 31.01.2026). (In Turkish)